The idea of the parks never being complete died with Walt and they were completed in the 1990s. There is no imagination left in the world at all. They had a good run. Disney after my takeover will drop that philosophy for Make Disney Great Again and only bringing back old things to replace newer things resulting no more brand new things and in kids liking the same things as their parents and grandparents. The parks under me will be locked in time in the 20th century under the “What would Walt do?” philosophy that ran it after his passing trying to emulate his past success.
This is what you get your employees to say when you know you did irreparable damage to your own properties.
The question is always if what is being done is an improvement or degradation. It’s if changes respect the guests and the vision of the park. The majority of Disney’s modern changes do not. They’re cheap IP cash grabs that remove history, context and aesthetic. Then the pixie dusters show up and crow about the parks not being museums, because they have no actual arguments in favor of what was done and cannot criticize the company they have an unhealthy parasocial relationship with.
It would be a great benefit to Disney and its guests if there was an outside body that regulated what Disney could change in their parks. They can not be trusted to make the right decisions on their own.
Comments for Stop Asking for Disney to Be “Frozen in Time”: Why Constant Change Is Actually Walt’s True Vision
Steve
The idea of the parks never being complete died with Walt and they were completed in the 1990s. There is no imagination left in the world at all. They had a good run. Disney after my takeover will drop that philosophy for Make Disney Great Again and only bringing back old things to replace newer things resulting no more brand new things and in kids liking the same things as their parents and grandparents. The parks under me will be locked in time in the 20th century under the “What would Walt do?” philosophy that ran it after his passing trying to emulate his past success.
TheObvious
This is what you get your employees to say when you know you did irreparable damage to your own properties.
The question is always if what is being done is an improvement or degradation. It’s if changes respect the guests and the vision of the park. The majority of Disney’s modern changes do not. They’re cheap IP cash grabs that remove history, context and aesthetic. Then the pixie dusters show up and crow about the parks not being museums, because they have no actual arguments in favor of what was done and cannot criticize the company they have an unhealthy parasocial relationship with.
It would be a great benefit to Disney and its guests if there was an outside body that regulated what Disney could change in their parks. They can not be trusted to make the right decisions on their own.