Disney’s “Woke” Snow White Just Took One Final Devastating Hit

Comments for Disney’s “Woke” Snow White Just Took One Final Devastating Hit

Rachel Zegler as Snow White in Disney's remake of the 1937 animation 'Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs'

Credit: Disney

9 Comments

  1. Anne

    Knowing so many people turned away from Snow Brown made me feel a little better about humanity but it’s sad seeing them forgive Disney so quickly and flock to the next watered down, soulless and DEI remake. I won’t be giving be giving live action Lilo and Stitch the time of day. If I want to please my nostalgic inner child I’ll watch the cartoon.

    1. JJ

      I’m glad I’m not the only one who is passing up Lilo and Stitch remake.

    2. Kelly Connerton

      To be honest, I never saw the cartoon and I thoroughly enjoyed the live action movie. To me as a Disney kid growing up, the live action was the quintessential disney movie. It wasn’t souless or DEI. No political or social message, just 2 hours of leaving the world behind the theater doors and sit back, eat some popcorn and watch a show. there people in the audience who had tears in their eyes and clapped during various parts of the movie, I have never done that in any cartoon movie.

  2. JJ

    I’m glad Snowboss Brown didn’t get the business she said she didn’t need. Also that the film never knew peace or profit.

  3. Tonya

    Disney needs to keep politics and wokeness out of their agendas. Disney is a place where a lot of family’s come to and they have turned a blind eye to the majority of their fan base. Anyone can be who they want, yet don’t promote it in the majorities face. Disney has hurt themselves with this, raising ticket prices, food prices, resort prices, etc. to offset their bad decisions. Was just there over memorial day weekend and was totally surprised the parks were not packed. Very short wait times and a lot 9f attractions were practically a walk on.

  4. greg jones

    I happen to agree completely with Rachel Z. She is an extremely talented star and singer. I do not believe that she had anything to do with the movie being a flop. Women’s roles have changed since 1937.

    1. John Wayne

      I just have to ask? Did you see the animated version of the movie or you weren’t born yet? And “extremely talented” really? What exactly has she done? She just started in one of Disney’s biggest failures! Face the truth? If she had kept her mouth shut about her political views and didn’t try to change Walt’s vision of the movie it might have had a chance but it’s destined for the dollar store bin.

    2. Steve

      You are wrong. Rachel Zegler has no talent and cannot sing. There is nothing wrong with the original animated version and keeping it in 1937. It will be 1937 in Hollywood again soon with the media conglomerates being broken up and the major film studios being handed back to the families of the great studio chiefs like the great Louis B. Mayer of MGM leading to the return of the classic Studio System. Movie stars will be put back under contract and literally owned by the studios again. MGM will return to its former glory as Mayer’s dream factory with “more stars than there are in the heavens.” Where Clark Gable became the King of Hollywood and where Judy Garland skipped down the Yellow Brick Road as Dorothy. Looking forward to Zegler quitting acting over it and taking part of a walkout of stars as she screams how she is “not a commodity.”

  5. RIta

    I don’t think it’s about wokeness. It is simply that we are nostalgic by nature, and we don’t want classics changed into something new. It’s okay to make live-action versions, but stick to the source material. Don’t change what we love about the originals. If you can’t do that, create new stories and leave the classics alone.

Comments are closed.