This is why actors should stick to acting allowing someone else to come up with the words and explanation!
First Brit here in the United States you are innocent until proven guilty. We adopted that because of you English who would persecute colonists without a trial.
So Daniel Radcliffe we see with your British mind that you all still believe that people are guilty before they are placed on trial.
So please apologize to Johnny as unlike your person smoking pot Johnny was innocent of claims made against him.
Also not like all you elite Hollywood types don’t get off with shooting and killing someone like how Alex did.
@Tomclay – you *do* know that JD lost his libel case in the UK, right? So it wasn’t “innocent until proven guilty”; it was “he was already proven guilty” in the UK. So please apologize to Daniel for your ignorance, kthx.
Wrong. The UK’s courts is nothing like the US’s court system. A media giant in the UK has more rights then JD does. Plus, AmberTurd lied on the stand for the media giant. She was just a witness.
Daniel needs to apologize to JD because JD was prosecuted without evidence and released from certain roles. I think too many people that think they are entitled to determine the fate of soneone else should treat others as they want to be treated and then false accusations would go away. DW is another entitled person who has ruined countless lives by prosecuting individuals without evidence.
I guess with Radcliff’s logic, I’ll be sure to believe him guilty of any claims before even looking at the evidence and waiting for a trial to take place.
First off the trial in UK was with The Sun (Rag mag) which considering JD’s win in US against AH defaming him found She did cause defamation to his character and cost him roles they should have publicly recanted their claims he was a “WB”.
Everyone knows AH had personal ties to that judge who should have recused himself.
WB as well as other. Hollywood actors considered JD guilty instead innocent without a trial.
Hopefully they’ve used this case as a learning experience.
needs to apologize to JD because JD was prosecuted without evidence and released from certain roles. I think too many people that think they are entitled to determine the fate of soneone else should treat others as they want to be treated and then false accusations would go away. DW is another entitled person who has ruined countless lives by prosecuting individuals without evidence
The UK trial was a farce with the Judge heavily personally involved in ensuring that The Sun won. His wife was friends with AH and they gave her a party before the trial. His son worked for DW who was friends with the judge. This judge ignored all of JD’s evidence and allowed AH to change her testimony several times. The verdict was and is ridiculous and should be reversed or updated with the true resolution to the case.
Comments for Daniel Radcliffe Calls Out Johnny Depp’s Controversial Casting
Credit: Disney (left), ABC (right)
Tomclay
This is why actors should stick to acting allowing someone else to come up with the words and explanation!
First Brit here in the United States you are innocent until proven guilty. We adopted that because of you English who would persecute colonists without a trial.
So Daniel Radcliffe we see with your British mind that you all still believe that people are guilty before they are placed on trial.
So please apologize to Johnny as unlike your person smoking pot Johnny was innocent of claims made against him.
Also not like all you elite Hollywood types don’t get off with shooting and killing someone like how Alex did.
Kellz
@Tomclay – you *do* know that JD lost his libel case in the UK, right? So it wasn’t “innocent until proven guilty”; it was “he was already proven guilty” in the UK. So please apologize to Daniel for your ignorance, kthx.
Ursula
Wrong. The UK’s courts is nothing like the US’s court system. A media giant in the UK has more rights then JD does. Plus, AmberTurd lied on the stand for the media giant. She was just a witness.
Jon Holt, M.D.
Thank you
Truth Seeker
Daniel needs to apologize to JD because JD was prosecuted without evidence and released from certain roles. I think too many people that think they are entitled to determine the fate of soneone else should treat others as they want to be treated and then false accusations would go away. DW is another entitled person who has ruined countless lives by prosecuting individuals without evidence.
Jon Holt, M.D.
The UK trial was compromised by the judge is connections to Amber. See other related comments. I believe your English term is”twit”.
Kdp
Thats because that crazy Amber didn’t get on the stand and prove she was the liar.
B
I’m half English half American and I can’t stand Daniel Radcliffe the pompous ass
Samantha
I guess with Radcliff’s logic, I’ll be sure to believe him guilty of any claims before even looking at the evidence and waiting for a trial to take place.
Lou
First off the trial in UK was with The Sun (Rag mag) which considering JD’s win in US against AH defaming him found She did cause defamation to his character and cost him roles they should have publicly recanted their claims he was a “WB”.
Everyone knows AH had personal ties to that judge who should have recused himself.
WB as well as other. Hollywood actors considered JD guilty instead innocent without a trial.
Hopefully they’ve used this case as a learning experience.
Laura
Daniel Radcliffe is an untalented, ugly little troll. He should keep his mouth shut.
Ahu
Agreed. He’s going to have to live off the millions he made on HP since nothing else he has done has been remotely successful. Farting corpse anyone?
Truth Seeker
needs to apologize to JD because JD was prosecuted without evidence and released from certain roles. I think too many people that think they are entitled to determine the fate of soneone else should treat others as they want to be treated and then false accusations would go away. DW is another entitled person who has ruined countless lives by prosecuting individuals without evidence
Truth Seeker
The UK trial was a farce with the Judge heavily personally involved in ensuring that The Sun won. His wife was friends with AH and they gave her a party before the trial. His son worked for DW who was friends with the judge. This judge ignored all of JD’s evidence and allowed AH to change her testimony several times. The verdict was and is ridiculous and should be reversed or updated with the true resolution to the case.
Cynthia Thomason
I am not saying who is wrong or right BUT spouse abuse goes both was. In today’s age more men are abused by their spouse
Comments are closed.