You obviously have no idea what goes on behind closed gates. Animals are born free and should remain free. Theme parks geared towards animals are just done to get money and to get people to come and pay to see them. They’re exploited, take advantage of, denied their natural freedoms and not given even adequate treatment for what they deserve. However if you think that’s such a great way to live, why don’t you go and live there. I’ll bet you’ll be singing a different tune after maybe just a a week.
Do your research, please, before you post such obviously ignorant comments.
My line of thinking is this. If the animals are in captivity for the sake of preservation and education, are being properly cared for, and the property owners and managers are working in full cooperation with conservationists and animal rights groups, then they should be able to legally house these animals within their property.
What MarineLand is doing by blanket banning these groups raises a *ton* of red flags, however. If they are in fact mistreating the animals, then the Canadian government should definitely step in and shut them down.
Nope not previous trespassing issues. These people know what Animal Activist are and what we’re capable of doing -bringing light to the dark underbelly of the animal theme parks. Has nothing to do with trespassing, has to do with bringing these atrocities to light and people that don’t want their seedy sides shown in the light, tend to block you before you’ve even crossed thru entrance gate.
Please do some research. What goes on behind closed doors is exactly the word I used – “Atrocity.”
I’ve been an animal activist for 35+ years and the biggest con jobs are “zoos,” “Animal theme parks,“ and aquariums. They are all there for one purpose and one purpose only – making money by people coming and staring at the animals who are kept in anything but their natural surroundings.
Great comeback. Now go and get some facts to try to prove me wrong. But you can’t, so you won’t. Do some research. I’ve been an animal activist for 35+ years and I’ve seen what goes on behind closed doors and it’s not what you all see when you go into these places as paying guests.
No because they’re not the sharpest pencils in the box. They’re playing up to the people that don’t know what really goes on behind closed doors and they’re making it look like people that haven’t even been there before are the bad guys. But they’re sending out a red alarm by doing this and what they’ve actually accomplished is to put themselves on every big activists’ radar. This isn’t the last we’re gonna hear about this because they definitely must have something to hide if they’re going through all of this trouble.
Unless the animals are there for rehabilitation and release or unable to survive in the wild – shut them down! Don’t go and support them.
MarineLand, Canada, is now on my “no go” list
They are born in captivity because their ancestors were captured and put in these places. There are places called sanctuary‘s for these animals that were born in captivity. They don’t belong in a place where people pay to come and go get them. They deserve to live in a natural habitat and I have a little human interaction as possible. What you’re doing is making excuses for what should never have been in the first place. Zoos are archaic and themepark zoos are atrocities. These animals are exposed to the sounds and the sites that are completely foreign to them and whether you think they were born there or not doesn’t change the fact that their instincts do not have them growing up around theme parks with all of the commotion the lights the sounds and the humans parading back-and-forth. These are bad surroundings for animals. My 35+ years of animal activism has taught me that animals deserve to be free and if they cannot be free in their own literal habitat they need to be free in a habitat that is as close to their natural habitat as is possible. And an animal theme park or a zoo or an aquarium (were animals live in very small cramped tanks) is nowhere near their natural habitat.
That’s not the solution. The solution is to fix what humans are doing to the earth and the ocean. Taking animals out of their natural habitat so that people will have to pay to see them is just as much a horrendous action as what is being done to the oceans and the earth. If you want to take these animals and put them in sanctuaries where people do not pay to go and see them and they are allowed to live in a natural habitat, then that is OK and it is saving the species. But to put animals in an environment where people have to pay to go see them so that corporations can make money is not the solution for saving species. Zoos and aquariums would have you believe that their purpose is to save species but that’s not their purpose. Their purpose is to make money. Zoos and aquariums are not nonprofit or not for profit. They are profit making corporations. And they are making money off of animals who have no say to how they are treated or where they are allowed to live. It is exploitation at its maximum.
Comments for Massive Theme Park Bans Filmmaker, Scientists, And Lawyers From Entering the Property
EricJ
Activist organization? Yep, I’m smelling a few previous trespassing offenses.
(“We took down one SeaWorld, we’ll take down the others!”)
Nia
Shut the hell up , the animals are safer there
jbdean
You obviously have no idea what goes on behind closed gates. Animals are born free and should remain free. Theme parks geared towards animals are just done to get money and to get people to come and pay to see them. They’re exploited, take advantage of, denied their natural freedoms and not given even adequate treatment for what they deserve. However if you think that’s such a great way to live, why don’t you go and live there. I’ll bet you’ll be singing a different tune after maybe just a a week.
Do your research, please, before you post such obviously ignorant comments.
Signed, an animal activist for 35+ years
Andrew Manson
My line of thinking is this. If the animals are in captivity for the sake of preservation and education, are being properly cared for, and the property owners and managers are working in full cooperation with conservationists and animal rights groups, then they should be able to legally house these animals within their property.
What MarineLand is doing by blanket banning these groups raises a *ton* of red flags, however. If they are in fact mistreating the animals, then the Canadian government should definitely step in and shut them down.
Greg
So you have no cats, dogs, hamsters gerbils?
Mark L Sheldon
Bs.. you sound like the idiots that killed willie kaiko
jbdean
Nope not previous trespassing issues. These people know what Animal Activist are and what we’re capable of doing -bringing light to the dark underbelly of the animal theme parks. Has nothing to do with trespassing, has to do with bringing these atrocities to light and people that don’t want their seedy sides shown in the light, tend to block you before you’ve even crossed thru entrance gate.
They’ve obviously something to hide. 🤔😤
AH
Atrocity? Get real.
jbdean
Please do some research. What goes on behind closed doors is exactly the word I used – “Atrocity.”
I’ve been an animal activist for 35+ years and the biggest con jobs are “zoos,” “Animal theme parks,“ and aquariums. They are all there for one purpose and one purpose only – making money by people coming and staring at the animals who are kept in anything but their natural surroundings.
Mark L Sheldon
B.s.
jvdean
Great comeback. Now go and get some facts to try to prove me wrong. But you can’t, so you won’t. Do some research. I’ve been an animal activist for 35+ years and I’ve seen what goes on behind closed doors and it’s not what you all see when you go into these places as paying guests.
Annika
You would think they’d try to be less suspicious if they were hiding something.
jbdean
No because they’re not the sharpest pencils in the box. They’re playing up to the people that don’t know what really goes on behind closed doors and they’re making it look like people that haven’t even been there before are the bad guys. But they’re sending out a red alarm by doing this and what they’ve actually accomplished is to put themselves on every big activists’ radar. This isn’t the last we’re gonna hear about this because they definitely must have something to hide if they’re going through all of this trouble.
SG
Unless the animals are there for rehabilitation and release or unable to survive in the wild – shut them down! Don’t go and support them.
MarineLand, Canada, is now on my “no go” list
Mark L Sheldon
B.s.not most of these animals were born in captivity and will never live a wild life you are delusional
jbdean
They are born in captivity because their ancestors were captured and put in these places. There are places called sanctuary‘s for these animals that were born in captivity. They don’t belong in a place where people pay to come and go get them. They deserve to live in a natural habitat and I have a little human interaction as possible. What you’re doing is making excuses for what should never have been in the first place. Zoos are archaic and themepark zoos are atrocities. These animals are exposed to the sounds and the sites that are completely foreign to them and whether you think they were born there or not doesn’t change the fact that their instincts do not have them growing up around theme parks with all of the commotion the lights the sounds and the humans parading back-and-forth. These are bad surroundings for animals. My 35+ years of animal activism has taught me that animals deserve to be free and if they cannot be free in their own literal habitat they need to be free in a habitat that is as close to their natural habitat as is possible. And an animal theme park or a zoo or an aquarium (were animals live in very small cramped tanks) is nowhere near their natural habitat.
Mark L Sheldon
the ocean is dying because of humans if we don’t have zoos and aquariums we will have no animals eventually
jbdean
That’s not the solution. The solution is to fix what humans are doing to the earth and the ocean. Taking animals out of their natural habitat so that people will have to pay to see them is just as much a horrendous action as what is being done to the oceans and the earth. If you want to take these animals and put them in sanctuaries where people do not pay to go and see them and they are allowed to live in a natural habitat, then that is OK and it is saving the species. But to put animals in an environment where people have to pay to go see them so that corporations can make money is not the solution for saving species. Zoos and aquariums would have you believe that their purpose is to save species but that’s not their purpose. Their purpose is to make money. Zoos and aquariums are not nonprofit or not for profit. They are profit making corporations. And they are making money off of animals who have no say to how they are treated or where they are allowed to live. It is exploitation at its maximum.
Brucethebeloved
35 years of drinking the cool aid.
Darshan
Shame on this article for putting a “promotion” for Marine Land at the end.
Way to stay neutral there.
Marine Land is garbage and needs to be shut down and converted into a regular theme park without any animals.
Hutchman50
They’re not hiding anything. They’re just tired of libtarded DooshNozzles trying to dictate everybody.
Comments are closed.