Why would you intentionally read an article talking about changed scenes when you haven’t watched it? Wouldn’t you be opening yourself up to spoilers just by reading the article? Don’t want the movie spoiled? Stay off articles mentioning the movie. The fact that there’s even comments mentioning spoilers is ridiculous, the title pretty much implies spoilers. If you can’t see that than maybe you deserve to have the movie spoiled.
“Marvel fans could not deal with the highly-anticipated potential comeback of Maguire’s Peter Parker from Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man trilogy (2002–2007) and…”
This is a badly run-on sentence. Also, your following text fails to explain how or why fans “could not deal”.
You write that fans viewed the movie in a cinema but you fail to explain where they viewed the altered scenes. Was it on DVD, streaming, 3D version or at a different cinema?
The other poorly written thing about this entire Article, is that it fails to specify that those Scenes are just Alternate Angles that were made Behind the Scenes of the Production.
Aka the Scenes we got from different angles in the final product.
They didn’t change anything in the Scenes that we got in the Movie.
Those “changed scenes” are simply their earlier versions from different angles, that the Producers spread on internet a couple of days ago…
Oh wow, I didn’t notice the typo in my first comment. Spoiler, not shoulder. Oops. But, you know, I’m not being paid to write this, so standards don’t need to be too high.
Comments for Marvel Is Already Changing Andrew Garfield, Tobey Maguire Scenes in ‘Spider-Man: No Way Home’
Kyle
Thanks for the spoilers, jerks.
Justin
What spoilers?
John
What are you talking about? The spoiler is in the freaking title…
Charlotte
The movie came out a month ago. We’re way past spoilers.
Unbearable
Why would you intentionally read an article talking about changed scenes when you haven’t watched it? Wouldn’t you be opening yourself up to spoilers just by reading the article? Don’t want the movie spoiled? Stay off articles mentioning the movie. The fact that there’s even comments mentioning spoilers is ridiculous, the title pretty much implies spoilers. If you can’t see that than maybe you deserve to have the movie spoiled.
Dave
“Marvel fans could not deal with the highly-anticipated potential comeback of Maguire’s Peter Parker from Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man trilogy (2002–2007) and…”
This is a badly run-on sentence. Also, your following text fails to explain how or why fans “could not deal”.
You write that fans viewed the movie in a cinema but you fail to explain where they viewed the altered scenes. Was it on DVD, streaming, 3D version or at a different cinema?
AlanHeller
The other poorly written thing about this entire Article, is that it fails to specify that those Scenes are just Alternate Angles that were made Behind the Scenes of the Production.
Aka the Scenes we got from different angles in the final product.
They didn’t change anything in the Scenes that we got in the Movie.
Those “changed scenes” are simply their earlier versions from different angles, that the Producers spread on internet a couple of days ago…
John
Dude… Spoiler in the title is not okay (this stuff pops up in people’s notifications) and you need to just GET. TO. THE. POINT.
Kristina
Agreed with other comments. This article is poorly written and the shoulder in the title is rude.
Kristina
Oh wow, I didn’t notice the typo in my first comment. Spoiler, not shoulder. Oops. But, you know, I’m not being paid to write this, so standards don’t need to be too high.
John
Wtf?
Thank you for spoiler 😖
Comments are closed.