Guest loading and unloading would have to get around the issues the submarines had. Person/hour rates were too low. Interesting idea, even for other areas.
You obviously meant to post this on April 1, because it’s clearly a joke! Right? Despite the fact that it is physically impossible to “float” a cloud city above Disneyland, do you really think that the Disney/Stars Wars crossover fan base is strong enough for Disney to consider such an insane idea? If you think the cost of building Galaxies Edge was outrageous then this would be that to the 100th power.
So, where exactly then do you propose putting this “city in the clouds”, assuming any rational local government would ever approve permits for it? Rationally it would obscure ALL site lines, exceeding all height regulations, and be an eyesore from miles away.
So, I appreciate the early April Fool’s joke, but you would make a lousy Imagineer. Besides, there are more reasonable concepts within the Disney library that would last longer and appeal to a much larger demographic.
There’s still also a little thing called the 360 Rule.
(And can we come up with a new Disney-name equivalent for Poe’s Law, ie. that it’s harder and harder to tell the April Fool’s posts from the REAL nutty Armchair-Imagineer fanboy columns?)
But to answer the question, yes it could, since the sky begins at the ground. 🙂
As far as the most “exciting” theme park expansion in Disney history, Galaxy’s Edge was clearly the most hyped and overexposed, only because social media didn’t exist in the days of the Epcot expansion. Epcot was far more exciting an expansion because it’s genesis was an idea of Walt Disney himself
Comments for Could Galaxy’s Edge Expand Up Toward the Sky?
Catch-2260611
Guest loading and unloading would have to get around the issues the submarines had. Person/hour rates were too low. Interesting idea, even for other areas.
C
Simplemente GENIAL
Shon Christy christy
You obviously meant to post this on April 1, because it’s clearly a joke! Right? Despite the fact that it is physically impossible to “float” a cloud city above Disneyland, do you really think that the Disney/Stars Wars crossover fan base is strong enough for Disney to consider such an insane idea? If you think the cost of building Galaxies Edge was outrageous then this would be that to the 100th power.
So, where exactly then do you propose putting this “city in the clouds”, assuming any rational local government would ever approve permits for it? Rationally it would obscure ALL site lines, exceeding all height regulations, and be an eyesore from miles away.
So, I appreciate the early April Fool’s joke, but you would make a lousy Imagineer. Besides, there are more reasonable concepts within the Disney library that would last longer and appeal to a much larger demographic.
EricJ
There’s still also a little thing called the 360 Rule.
(And can we come up with a new Disney-name equivalent for Poe’s Law, ie. that it’s harder and harder to tell the April Fool’s posts from the REAL nutty Armchair-Imagineer fanboy columns?)
But to answer the question, yes it could, since the sky begins at the ground. 🙂
Mickeba
As far as the most “exciting” theme park expansion in Disney history, Galaxy’s Edge was clearly the most hyped and overexposed, only because social media didn’t exist in the days of the Epcot expansion. Epcot was far more exciting an expansion because it’s genesis was an idea of Walt Disney himself
Comments are closed.