Add Your Voice ↓
My problem is that the story was too small for the gigantic world that Pixar created.
The details of the environment were so amazing that you couldn’t wait to ride through it with Merida and follow her through a Lord of the Rings-like adventure. But in the end it was merely a backdrop that the characters stood in front of rather than an environment that they traveled through. The movie wasn’t “bad”, but it did feel like a let down because with Cars 2 being so mediocre then Pixar really needed a bullseye. (groan)
Seriously though, I hope that the crass and juvenile humor of both Cars 2 and Brave aren’t a trend because Pixar has a reputation to rebuild and genital jokes aren’t the way to get them back on top.
I agree with absolutely everything you wrote. My thoughts exactly.
I agree with Corbin 100%. I also wanted to add that the story was weaker as time passed; as well as the humor. I am not recommending this movie and if I have to pinpoint one thing, it is the nudity. It was totally unexpected and unwarranted. I was upset that my son was subjected to it. My bad, I didn’t think I had to research a pixar movie for questionable material.
Not another princes, was my first thought. I’m getting sick of almost every Disney movie is slapping the princes thing on it. The movies are greet, don”t get me wrong but The Princes and the Frog would have been awesome if she just met a guy and they lived happily ever after, the same as Tangled. They seem only to be succesfull if they merry a guy who is rich and has power, great message Disney.
That said, I love the previews I’ve seen from Brave and the so called (by prude Americans)”comedic nudity”will go down for what it is in the rest of the western world, just fun.
I think the word you keep trying to use is “princess” with two Ss at the end.
The word “princes” with only one S is the plural of the word “prince”, meaning there are two or more “princes” who are male royals.
Maybe the people you call “prude Americans” are really people who just have trouble understanding you because you are using the wrong words to communicate.
Maybe you forgot, but Rapunzel DID end up with a regular guy. Flynn isn’t rich or powerful, so um, yes, great message, Disney. Nice try. Care to have another?
If Disney princesses “just met a guy and they lived happily ever after,” that would sure make for a really boring movie.
I don’t know why bathroom humor has to be part of Disney movies. This started with the flatulence in The Lion King from Pumbaa. What’s next? Remaking Snow White so that this time the poisoned apple gives her diarrhea? I am really sick of this trend of putting bathroom humor in Disney things.
I hadnt seen Lion King in years before it came out on 3D and I guess I forgot how much bathroom humor was in it. Even the music had a reference to farting.
I know that kids love it, but IMO cheap laughs are a sign of bad writing which is what’s most disappointing about seeing Pixar going down this route.The yellow snowcones in Monsters Inc is good crude humor, but Mater peeing himself, Mater getting an “undercarriage wash” or all the mooning etc in Brave are changing my view of Pixar because they (used to) know how to make a solid joke without having to be in the gutters.
Bathroom Humor = no money from me and my family. They were so proud of it they put it in the trailer. Good luck with that guys. This is the first Pixar movie I will not bother to go see.
If you’re referring to the “feast your eyes” gag it is a brief joke that takes advantage of the setting of men in kilts.
I hope John Ratzenberger has a part! 🙂
For the complaints of the “small scale” or less environments than some were expecting: the story takes place exactly where it needs to. There are many incredible environments in this world, and the fact that you weren’t paying attention to them is exactly what Pixar wants. If you’re paying attention to the backgrounds then they’re failing in their storytelling. There was an entire montage early in the film comprised only of Scotland, even some environments we didn’t go back to later in the film. It will be included in the film if it serves the story, otherwise it’s just fat that needs to be trimmed.
I think people are having trouble with this movie because its different! I LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Its not another classic pixar comedy it has more depth and I just think its a breathe of fresh air. The humor was not bad, I thought it worked so well!
Good review, Ricky. I pretty much agree with every point. It’s interesting how this movie is being reviewed almost across the board as just okay. It was good, but not great, which I was expecting. (Of course it’s still light years better than Cars 2, but that’s not a very high standard to beat…)
And yes, the potty humor is increasing. I always thought that’s what separated Pixar’s animated movies from those churned out by DreamWorks, but now the lines are blurring a lot more. Brave looked a lot like a DreamWorks movie from the first trailers, and How To Train Your Dragon has quite a few Pixar-like touches. Hopefully Pixar doesn’t resort to increased gross humor (which I thought was minor in Brave but heavy in Cars 2) and instead keeps it classy going forward. They have a reputation to uphold after all, and after Cars 2, to win back.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Sign me up for the newsletter!
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Friend's Email Address
Your Email Address