Transgener women are NOT women. They are people pentending to be women. Which is fine if it helps them deal with thwir mwntal illness. The rest of us however are not obigated to play along.
Trans people are also not obligated to play along with whatever your belief system is. More importantly, how does their existence impact your own life in any direct way?
By trying to force sane people to say a man is a woman, suing Christian bakers for not baking a gay cake. Trans people reading stories to children is another.
I fail to see how any of the three things you listed has a negative effect on your own life. You’re personally being “forced” to say a man is a woman? In other words, you don’t have control over your own words, even though a public persona like J.K. Rowling apparently does? Also, your definition of “sane” is clearly influenced by a belief system that not everyone shares, and your insinuation that non-believers are somehow inferior is an arrogant and prideful perspective, which is not remotely Christ-like. Kind of ironic, really.
What’s the name of the bakery you own? Since I asked how YOUR life is directly impacted, you obviously must own one. Regardless, lawsuits can be brought by anyone for any reason, and their fairness is determined in court via a legal system, not by ideology or an imagined set of morals.
What is the impact of a trans person reading a story to children, in your opinion? Do you believe they are forever damaged psychologically because the storyteller had a particular appearance? Suppose the storyteller was dressed like a clown: Would an impressionable child be more susceptible to indoctrination by a circus? In that case, perhaps children should never have stories read to them by a priest, since the sight of a man reading to them while wearing religious garments would be indoctrination. I’m just applying your own logic here. And as long as the protection of children is our primary goal, parents would be wise to teach their children that a man in a priest’s uniform is a major red flag and the ultimate “stranger danger,” according to overwhelming amounts of historical precedent.
I guess that means Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and the majority of the Harry Potter cast are Hollywood scum, too, since they’ve turned their backs on Rowling. Don’t they realize that having your own individual beliefs is taboo in Hollywood? How will they ever survive now? *he asked with a knowing snicker*
Oh no. Whatever will Pedro do without your viewership? He’ll keep cashing those Mandalorian checks, I reckon. Go ahead and enjoy that pointless boycott. As long as you feel better announcing your intentions to a bunch of strangers in a comment thread, that’s the important thing. Look at how much power you have now, sitting behind a keyboard with those “big boy” pants of yours. Savor this magical moment.
I don’t gotta wonder (or “wander”) that at all. As someone with no siblings and no family members with alternative lifestyles, I still find it easy to be an ally who supports others trying to live as their full and authentic selves. But thanks for your “concern,” however questionable.
Comments for Pedro Pascal Doesn’t Regret Calling JK Rowling a “Heinous Loser”
Steven
Transgener women are NOT women. They are people pentending to be women. Which is fine if it helps them deal with thwir mwntal illness. The rest of us however are not obigated to play along.
Jenna
Trans people are also not obligated to play along with whatever your belief system is. More importantly, how does their existence impact your own life in any direct way?
Tony
By trying to force sane people to say a man is a woman, suing Christian bakers for not baking a gay cake. Trans people reading stories to children is another.
Jenna
I fail to see how any of the three things you listed has a negative effect on your own life. You’re personally being “forced” to say a man is a woman? In other words, you don’t have control over your own words, even though a public persona like J.K. Rowling apparently does? Also, your definition of “sane” is clearly influenced by a belief system that not everyone shares, and your insinuation that non-believers are somehow inferior is an arrogant and prideful perspective, which is not remotely Christ-like. Kind of ironic, really.
What’s the name of the bakery you own? Since I asked how YOUR life is directly impacted, you obviously must own one. Regardless, lawsuits can be brought by anyone for any reason, and their fairness is determined in court via a legal system, not by ideology or an imagined set of morals.
What is the impact of a trans person reading a story to children, in your opinion? Do you believe they are forever damaged psychologically because the storyteller had a particular appearance? Suppose the storyteller was dressed like a clown: Would an impressionable child be more susceptible to indoctrination by a circus? In that case, perhaps children should never have stories read to them by a priest, since the sight of a man reading to them while wearing religious garments would be indoctrination. I’m just applying your own logic here. And as long as the protection of children is our primary goal, parents would be wise to teach their children that a man in a priest’s uniform is a major red flag and the ultimate “stranger danger,” according to overwhelming amounts of historical precedent.
Zeroartthout
And many don’t regret calling him a beta male. So win win.
Carter
Need mental help much, Jenna?
Jenna
Nope, but thanks for asking, Carter. Need validation from strangers much? Here’s that attention you ordered.
Zeroartthout
Tell that to any governmental form.
Spank You Very Much
Sweet sugartits, Steven. You TYPE like you have mental illness. If you think you might be having a stroke, seek medical help at once.
Tony
She’s the richest loser ever.
Tony
I’m not sure if he knows the definition of either heinous or loser. She isn’t either one of those. Heck, she’s awesome in my book!
Carter
Same. JK Rowling is a rare heroine to stand against woke. Pedro is nothing but Hollywood scum.
Spank You Very Much
I guess that means Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and the majority of the Harry Potter cast are Hollywood scum, too, since they’ve turned their backs on Rowling. Don’t they realize that having your own individual beliefs is taboo in Hollywood? How will they ever survive now? *he asked with a knowing snicker*
Carter
I stand with Rowling. Pedro Pascal is the one who is the loser. Anyone who supports the woke community is a loser.
Pinky
💯%
Spank You Very Much
The so-called “loser” has a global platform for his message. You have this comment thread. Enjoy and good luck.
Pinky
Pedro is the only loser of the two. Boycotting anything that soyboy is in.
Kenne
Oh, I’m sure he’s absolutely crushed to hear that.
Spank You Very Much
Oh no. Whatever will Pedro do without your viewership? He’ll keep cashing those Mandalorian checks, I reckon. Go ahead and enjoy that pointless boycott. As long as you feel better announcing your intentions to a bunch of strangers in a comment thread, that’s the important thing. Look at how much power you have now, sitting behind a keyboard with those “big boy” pants of yours. Savor this magical moment.
#bahahahahaha
Fabulousness
#GodIsGay
Concerned citizen
Gotta wander what Pedro pascal’s attitude toward transgenders would be had he not had a close blood tie to one hmmmm.
Jenna
I don’t gotta wonder (or “wander”) that at all. As someone with no siblings and no family members with alternative lifestyles, I still find it easy to be an ally who supports others trying to live as their full and authentic selves. But thanks for your “concern,” however questionable.
Comments are closed.