The live action remakes, aka reboots, are a “safe bet” because Disney can rely on estasblished characters, stories, and content, the work has already been done…its just a matter of a refresh of cast, some character, story ideas, and settings.
Disney sees the investment return profitable, along with the least amount of work without taking risk is on completely new ideas for films.
In terms of film making, the remakes, reboots does have a purpouseful side to it. It allows for new gwnerations of film makers to present how they would interpret the film to be produced as if they were the first ones to make it.
The trouble is so many remakes reboots are almost exact copiea of the original to which the new filmakers are influenced by.
It would almost have to be where a new filmaker would be unaware of the film in its original form they are going to make when handed the script.
Take a look at Rob Zombies Halloween remakes reboots. Though cast, and some elements are different, its almost a clone of the original. This can be due to the studios influence, the idea if we stick to the original the studio will make money.
And then the argument why even make a reboot when fans of the film love the original?
In some cases a reboot, or sequel are not needed, because as the story progresses its only kept going for sake of box office profit and down the way a third fourth fifth film, recycles the same storylines, even settings to profress the story.
At times its a no win situation for the film maker that wants to present their version of a classic. No matter what the first original film is always the best.
Comments for Has Disney Run Out of New Ideas?
Royz
Run Out of New Ideas….Or More Like A Safe Bet…
The live action remakes, aka reboots, are a “safe bet” because Disney can rely on estasblished characters, stories, and content, the work has already been done…its just a matter of a refresh of cast, some character, story ideas, and settings.
Disney sees the investment return profitable, along with the least amount of work without taking risk is on completely new ideas for films.
In terms of film making, the remakes, reboots does have a purpouseful side to it. It allows for new gwnerations of film makers to present how they would interpret the film to be produced as if they were the first ones to make it.
The trouble is so many remakes reboots are almost exact copiea of the original to which the new filmakers are influenced by.
It would almost have to be where a new filmaker would be unaware of the film in its original form they are going to make when handed the script.
Take a look at Rob Zombies Halloween remakes reboots. Though cast, and some elements are different, its almost a clone of the original. This can be due to the studios influence, the idea if we stick to the original the studio will make money.
And then the argument why even make a reboot when fans of the film love the original?
In some cases a reboot, or sequel are not needed, because as the story progresses its only kept going for sake of box office profit and down the way a third fourth fifth film, recycles the same storylines, even settings to profress the story.
At times its a no win situation for the film maker that wants to present their version of a classic. No matter what the first original film is always the best.
Oscar Marquez
I just want Disney to own Winx Club, it’s my passion project. Is that too much to ask?
Comments are closed.